Why Europe Needs Latvia
Inside the Baltic Drone and Air Defense Industry Securing the EU's Eastern Flank
Article Written by Jett James Pruitt
As the European Union (EU) faces a more precarious relationship with the United States and continues to be dragged down by the financial and humanitarian costs of the Russo-Ukrainian War, Brussels will increasingly integrate Latvia into its military and inter-state security apparatus in the foreseeable future out of pure necessity. This is the case because the small Baltic nation, which comprises a mere 1.8 million people and borders both Russia and Belarus, has crucially emerged as one of the EU’s leading investors in the production of drone and counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology, and a potential bulwark of continental security in the remote (although not implausible) scenario of a direct, fully mobilized attack on NATO territory.
For context, Latvia’s strategic pivot towards drone production began in 2024, when Riga committed €20 million to the Drone Coalition (now composed of 21 member states) in support of Ukraine. Latvia committed the same amount in 2025 and €15 million as of this year. In addition to coordinating the delivery of drones to Ukraine, the country has further collaborated with a number of domestic manufacturers such as Eraser, Temeso, and Atlas Dynamics to provide the National Armed Forces (NAF) with both unique battlefield capabilities and dual-use technology.
As of this writing, more than 20 specialized companies operate across Latvia’s military and drone-production sectors, with the country ranking seventh in Europe by drone export volume. This accomplishment is especially notable considering Latvia has one of the smallest economies in the Eurozone. To illustrate, the country’s nominal gross domestic product (GDP) is less than 1 percent of Germany’s, the EU’s largest economy.
However, while Latvia has effectively mobilized national resources for aerial weapons procurement, the rest of the EU is struggling with constraints on industrial capacity.
A leaked October 2026 report from the European Defense Agency (EDA) indicates only one-third of EU counter-drone programs will be delivered by 2030. Grimly, the report states, “Despite the high level of attention paid to the acquisition of drone and counter-drone capabilities, significant capability gaps and external dependencies continue to affect overall European readiness…Industrial capacity has yet to reach the scale and responsiveness required for protracted high-intensity operations, as the pace of technological innovation is outstripping traditional acquisition cycles, creating a persistent risk that capabilities become obsolete before they can be fielded.”
Previously, in a September 2026 interview with The Guardian in Washington, D.C., Latvia’s president Edgars Rinkēvičs argued that Europe is lagging in the development of drone and aerial warfare in Ukraine, warning “What we see is that air defense, drone defense, anti-ballistic defense has serious problems. And let’s be frank: Ukraine has it. The whole of Europe and NATO has it.” He elaborated “If Russia decides to use a couple of missiles in that territory, I think that would be a serious challenge today for many countries to cope with that.”
Not to mention, European innovation in aerial defense production is stifled by the United States’ imposition of a 15 percent tariff on EU drones in August 2026, thus further straining transatlantic relations, reigniting calls for the continent’s strategic autonomy, and accelerating the EU’s shift from a mainly economic union to an evolving security actor.
For these reasons, Europe needs Latvia, as the country’s strategic focus holds the potential to fill in major supply gaps resulting from fragmented defense procurement and over-reliance on external powers. So far, the EU has authorized a €3.5 billion Security Action for Europe (SAFE) loan agreement with Latvia to spur the development of UAVs and counter-drone missiles. While attending the signing ceremony for the SAFE pact, EU Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius referred to Latvia as a “front-runner in European defense coordination” and a model for other member states.
Nevertheless, Europe still has a long road ahead. The EU is currently in the process of sourcing at least 60 percent of defense procurement from European suppliers within a decade, even though dependencies on countries such as China remain a hurdle. Riga’s holistic approach to national defense and niche focus on drone production has allowed the country to overcome constraints on industrial capacity, small personnel forces, and technical limitations to emerge as an air defense titan in its own right. In this manner, Latvia serves as a model for other NATO and EU countries struggling with limited economic resources in mitigating both conventional and hybrid threats from Russia.
Latvia — with its domestic mobilization towards aerial defense and its geostrategic importance bordering Russia and Belarus — thus serves as a critical first step in both consolidating the EU’s eastern flank and ameliorating the EU’s industrial shortcomings.
What are your thoughts? Please share this article with your comments.
Jett James Pruitt is a Native American, Pulitzer Prize-nominated author of the bestselling book THROUGH THE EYES OF A YOUNG AMERICAN. He is the founder and editor-in-chief of TheGenZPost.com and a political strategist specializing in Generation Z voter trends. He is currently a B.A. International Politics student at The University of London Institute in Paris. His next book, THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: What America's Political Parties Must Do To Win Over Generation Z, will be released in major bookstores worldwide early 2027.
Comments